Cardiovascular disease hospitalizations among women who undergo fertility treatment.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are women who receive fertility treatment at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalization compared with women who do not? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of all women registered for fertility treatment at Monash IVF between 1998 and 2014. This cohort was linked to the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset, which contains records of all hospital admissions in the Australian state of Victoria. Age- and Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD)-adjusted relative risks of CVD hospitalization for women who did or did not undergo fertility treatment were determined using Poisson regression. Risks were calculated overall by CVD subtype and stratified by area-based social disadvantage using IRSD fifths, number of stimulated cycles and mean oocytes per cycle. RESULTS: Of 27,262 women registered for fertility treatment, 24,131 underwent treatment and 3131 did not. No significant difference was found in risk of CVD hospitalization between treated and untreated women overall (adjusted RR 0.93, 95% 0.82 to 1.05) or by CVD subtype. The admission risk for CVD was significantly lower in treated women who had a mean of fewer than five oocytes per cycle (adjusted RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.92) compared with untreated women. Treated women residing in areas within the second IRSD fifth were less likely to be hospitalized for CVD compared with untreated women (age-adjusted RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Fertility treatment is not associated with increased risk of CVD hospitalization. Lower risk among some subgroups of treated women may be explained by social disadvantage.

Study protocol for a randomised open-label clinical trial examining the safety and efficacy of the Android Artificial Pancreas System (AAPS) with advanced bolus-free features in adults with type 1 diabetes: the 'CLOSE IT' (Closed Loop Open SourcE In Type 1 diabetes) trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have become commercially available following randomised controlled trials demonstrating benefits in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, their real-world utility may be undermined by user-associated burdens, including the need to carbohydrate count and deliver manual insulin boluses. There is an important need for a 'fully automated closed loop' (FCL) AID system, without manual mealtime boluses. The (Closed Loop Open SourcE In Type 1 diabetes) trial is a randomised trial comparing an FCL AID system to the same system used as a hybrid closed loop (HCL) in people with T1D, in an outpatient setting over an extended time frame. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised, open-label, parallel, non-inferiority trial comparing the Android Artificial Pancreas System (AAPS) AID algorithm used as FCL to the same algorithm used as HCL. Seventy-five participants aged 18-70 will be randomised (1:1) to one of two treatment arms for 12 weeks: (a) FCL-participants will be advised not to bolus for meals and (b) HCL-participants will use the AAPS AID algorithm as HCL with announced meals. The primary outcome is the percentage of time in target sensor glucose range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes include other glycaemic metrics, safety, psychosocial factors, platform performance and user dietary factors. Twenty FCL arm participants will participate in a 4-week extension phase comparing glycaemic and dietary outcomes using NovoRapid (insulin aspart) to Fiasp (insulin aspart and niacinamide). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals are by the Alfred Health Ethics Committee (615/22) (Australia) and Health and Disability Ethics Committees (2022 FULL 13832) (New Zealand). Each participant will provide written informed consent. Data protection and confidentiality will be ensured. Study results will be disseminated by publications, conferences and patient advocacy groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ACTRN12622001400752 and ACTRN12622001401741.

Liver disease mortality and hospitalisations among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The burden of liver disease among people with diabetes at a population level is unknown. We explored the burden and trends of liver disease mortality and hospitalisations among Australians with diabetes. METHODS: We linked Australians with type 2 diabetes on the National Diabetes Services Scheme to the National Death Index for 2002-2019 to determine trends in the proportion of deaths due to liver disease, overall and by subcategory. We also determined the leading reasons and risk factors for liver disease hospitalisations in those with diabetes over this period. Finally, we compared the burden of liver disease hospitalisations among those with diabetes to the general population using excess hospitalisations per 100 000 person-years. RESULTS: Among Australians with type 2 diabetes (n = 1 122 431) liver diseases accounted for between 1.5% and 1.9% of deaths between 2002 and 2019, roughly one-third of the proportion of deaths caused by kidney disease. The proportion of deaths due to inflammatory liver diseases among those with diabetes increased from .08% in 2002 to .27% in 2019. Alcohol-related liver disease accounted for the greatest share (22.7%) of liver disease hospitalisation in those with diabetes, but the number of hospitalisations for this condition declined over time. Compared to the general population, men (RR 3.63, 95% CI 3.44-3.84) and women (RR 4.49, 4.21-4.78) with diabetes were at higher risk of hospitalisation for fibrosis and cirrhosis; however, this did not translate to a substantial excess risk per 100 000 population. CONCLUSIONS: Better screening methods for liver disease among people with diabetes should be developed and implemented into practice.

Causes of death among Australians with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, 2002-2019.

AIMS: This population-based study sought to explore in detail the conditions driving the diversification in causes of death among people with diabetes. METHODS: We linked Australians with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of all ages on the National Diabetes Services Scheme to the National Death Index for 2002-2019. We investigated the proportional contributions of different causes of death to total deaths over time across eight categories of causes of death, stratified by sex and diabetes type. The underlying causes of death were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2019, there was a shift in the causes of death among Australians with diabetes away from cardiovascular disease. The proportion of deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease declined in both sexes (ptrend <0.001), most substantially among women with type 2 diabetes from 48.2% in 2002 to 30.7% in 2019. Among men with type 2 diabetes, cancer replaced cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death. The proportion of deaths due to dementia increased overall, from 2% in 2002 to over 7% in 2019, and across all age groups, notably from 1% to 4% in those aged 70-79. The proportion of deaths due to falls and Parkinson's disease also increased. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a shift of causes of death among those with diabetes away from cardiovascular disease. The proportion of deaths due to conditions such as dementia and falls is increasing among those with diabetes, which will require consideration when planning future resource allocation.

Reasons for Hospitalization Among Australians With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes and COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to determine the reasons for hospitalization in Australian people with diabetes who contract COVID-19. METHODS: All COVID-19 cases reported to the Victorian Department of Health and linked hospitalization data were assessed. We determined reasons for acute (0 to 30 days) and postacute (31 to 365 days) hospitalization among those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and COVID-19, compared to those with COVID-19 and no diabetes, and to admissions before the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 13,302 Australians with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were hospitalized in the state of Victoria in the 12 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. Respiratory diseases accounted for 40% of acute admissions among those with diabetes. Viral pneumonia was the leading cause of acute hospitalization among those with diabetes and constituted a larger proportion of admissions in those with compared to those without diabetes (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.76 to 1.99). The distribution of postacute hospitalizations among those with diabetes aligned with that of people with diabetes before the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory diseases are the leading cause of acute hospitalization in those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and COVID-19. The reasons for postacute hospitalization resemble those in people with diabetes and no COVID-19. We reinforce the importance of community management of people with diabetes in the ongoing pandemic.

Hospital admissions among people with diabetes: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the reasons for hospital admission among people with diabetes. METHODS: We searched Emcare, Embase, Medline and Google Scholar databases for population-based studies describing the causes of hospitalisation among people with diabetes. We included articles published in English from 1980 to 2022. For each study, we determined the most frequent reasons for admission. Studies were assessed for quality using the Newcastle Ottawa quality assessment tool. RESULTS: 6920 research articles were retrieved from the search of all sources. After screening the titles and abstracts of these, we reviewed the full text of 135 papers and finally included data from 42 studies. Admissions among the total diabetes were reported in 25 papers: 5 articles reported type 1 diabetes alone, 10 articles reported type 2 diabetes alone and the remaining 2 articles reported type 1 and type 2 diabetes separately. Among the 25 total and type 2 diabetes studies that reported the distribution of hospitalisations in broad categories, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) were the leading cause of admission in 19/25 (76%) of studies. Among the 19 studies that reported CVD admissions by subcategories, ischaemic or coronary heart disease was the leading subtype of CVD in 58% of studies. The other common causes of admissions were infections, renal disorders, endocrine, nutritional, metabolic and immunity disorders. In people with type 1 diabetes, acute diabetes complications were the leading cause of admission. CONCLUSION: CVD are the leading cause of hospital admission for people with diabetes, with ischaemic or coronary heart disease as the predominant subtype.

Reasons for hospitalisation in youth with type 1 diabetes, 2010-2019.

AIMS: To determine the incidence of hospitalisation for all diagnoses among Australian youth with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We linked Australians aged under 20 years with type 1 diabetes on the National Diabetes Services Scheme (n = 45,685) to hospital admission data from 2010 to 2019. We determined relative risks (RR) of hospitalisation among those with type 1 diabetes in the states of Victoria and Queensland (n = 21,898) compared to the general population for 2010-2017 using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Australian youth with type 1 diabetes had increased risk for almost all reasons for hospitalisation compared to the general population, especially infections such as anogenital herpesviral infections (RR 54.83, 95% CI 33.21-90.53), and mental health disorders including personality disorders (RR 9.70, 95% CI 8.02-11.72). Among those with type 1 diabetes, over 60% of hospitalisations were directly related to diabetes, almost half of which were for ketoacidosis. Approximately 15% of ketoacidosis admissions occurred within 3 months of diabetes diagnosis. One quarter of those with admissions for ketoacidosis were readmitted for ketoacidosis within 12 months. Residence in areas of high socio-economic disadvantage was an independent risk factor for admission and readmission for ketoacidosis. CONCLUSIONS: Youth with type 1 diabetes are susceptible to a wide range of complications. Clinicians should consider screening and prevention for conditions such as infections and mental health disorders. Targeted support and education around glycaemic management should be considered in those at high risk for ketoacidosis admission including those living in areas of high socio-economic disadvantage.

Hospitalisation for mental health disorders in Australians with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To determine the burden and leading reasons for mental health hospitalisation among Australians with diabetes. METHODS: We determined the incidence of hospitalisation for all mental health disorders in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of all ages by linking the National Diabetes Services Scheme to hospital admission datasets from 2010 to 2017. We compared those with type 2 diabetes aged 15 and above to the general population using excess hospitalisations per 100,000 person-years associated with diabetes. RESULTS: Depressive disorders were the leading reason for mental health admission in Australians with diabetes, responsible for 6.09 (95% CI 5.78-6.42) and 7.05 (6.95-7.14) admissions per 1,000 person-years in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. When considering only one admission per person, mental health admission rates were up to 90% lower. Among males with type 2 diabetes, stress and adjustment disorders were the leading cause of excess admissions compared to the general population, while depressive disorders were the leading cause in females. CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial burden of psychiatric hospitalisations among Australians with diabetes, reinforcing the importance of mental health awareness among diabetes clinicians, and support by psychiatric teams for those with diabetes to prevent readmission.

Reasons for hospitalisation in Australians with type 2 diabetes compared to the general population, 2010-2017.

AIMS: We sought to quantify the burden and diversity of reasons for hospital admission amongst Australians with type 2 diabetes compared to the general population. METHODS: We linked Australians aged 15 and above with type 2 diabetes on the National Diabetes Services Scheme (n = 456,265) to hospital admission data to determine hospitalisation risks at ICD-10 three-digit diagnosis level for 2010-2017. We performed Poisson regression to determine the hospitalisation burden of each diagnosis among those with diabetes compared to the general population and reported excess annual hospitalisations per 100,000 people with diabetes. RESULTS: Australians with diabetes were at increased risk of hospitalisation for most conditions. In addition to traditional complications including heart failure, other conditions such as mental health disorders and anaemias were major causes for excess hospitalisation, compared to the general population. The leading cause of excess hospitalisation in women with diabetes was iron deficiency anaemia, responsible for 558 excess annual hospitalisations per 100,000 women with diabetes. In men, the leading cause was cellulitis, responsible for 364 excess annual hospitalisations per 100,000. CONCLUSIONS: The diseases responsible for excess hospitalisations in type 2 diabetes are more diverse than previously recognised. This may need to be reflected in changes to diabetes management.

Lifetime risk, life expectancy, and years of life lost to type 2 diabetes in 23 high-income jurisdictions: a multinational, population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major public health issue. Because lifetime risk, life expectancy, and years of life lost are meaningful metrics for clinical decision making, we aimed to estimate these measures for type 2 diabetes in the high-income setting. METHODS: For this multinational, population-based study, we sourced data from 24 databases for 23 jurisdictions (either whole countries or regions of a country): Australia; Austria; Canada; Denmark; Finland; France; Germany; Hong Kong; Hungary; Israel; Italy; Japan; Latvia; Lithuania; the Netherlands; Norway; Scotland; Singapore; South Korea; Spain; Taiwan; the UK; and the USA. Our main outcomes were lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes, life expectancy in people with and without type 2 diabetes, and years of life lost to type 2 diabetes. We modelled the incidence and mortality of type 2 diabetes in people with and without type 2 diabetes in sex-stratified, age-adjusted, and calendar year-adjusted Poisson models for each jurisdiction. Using incidence and mortality, we constructed life tables for people of both sexes aged 20-100 years for each jurisdiction and at two timepoints 5 years apart in the period 2005-19 where possible. Life expectancy from a given age was computed as the area under the survival curves and lifetime lost was calculated as the difference between the expected lifetime of people with versus without type 2 diabetes at a given age. Lifetime risk was calculated as the proportion of each cohort who developed type 2 diabetes between the ages of 20 years and 100 years. We estimated 95% CIs using parametric bootstrapping. FINDINGS: Across all study cohorts from the 23 jurisdictions (total person-years 1 577 234 194), there were 5 119 585 incident cases of type 2 diabetes, 4 007 064 deaths in those with type 2 diabetes, and 11 854 043 deaths in those without type 2 diabetes. The lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes ranged from 16·3% (95% CI 15·6-17·0) for Scottish women to 59·6% (58·5-60·8) for Singaporean men. Lifetime risk declined with time in 11 of the 15 jurisdictions for which two timepoints were studied. Among people with type 2 diabetes, the highest life expectancies were found for both sexes in Japan in 2017-18, where life expectancy at age 20 years was 59·2 years (95% CI 59·2-59·3) for men and 64·1 years (64·0-64·2) for women. The lowest life expectancy at age 20 years with type 2 diabetes was observed in 2013-14 in Lithuania (43·7 years [42·7-44·6]) for men and in 2010-11 in Latvia (54·2 years [53·4-54·9]) for women. Life expectancy in people with type 2 diabetes increased with time for both sexes in all jurisdictions, except for Spain and Scotland. The life expectancy gap between those with and without type 2 diabetes declined substantially in Latvia from 2010-11 to 2015-16 and in the USA from 2009-10 to 2014-15. Years of life lost to type 2 diabetes ranged from 2·5 years (Latvia; 2015-16) to 12·9 years (Israel Clalit Health Services; 2015-16) for 20-year-old men and from 3·1 years (Finland; 2011-12) to 11·2 years (Israel Clalit Health Services; 2010-11 and 2015-16) for 20-year-old women. With time, the expected number of years of life lost to type 2 diabetes decreased in some jurisdictions and increased in others. The greatest decrease in years of life lost to type 2 diabetes occurred in the USA between 2009-10 and 2014-15 for 20-year-old men (a decrease of 2·7 years). INTERPRETATION: Despite declining lifetime risk and improvements in life expectancy for those with type 2 diabetes in many high-income jurisdictions, the burden of type 2 diabetes remains substantial. Public health strategies might benefit from tailored approaches to continue to improve health outcomes for people with diabetes. FUNDING: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Diabetes Australia.

The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus.

The traditional complications of diabetes mellitus are well known and continue to pose a considerable burden on millions of people living with diabetes mellitus. However, advances in the management of diabetes mellitus and, consequently, longer life expectancies, have resulted in the emergence of evidence of the existence of a different set of lesser-acknowledged diabetes mellitus complications. With declining mortality from vascular disease, which once accounted for more than 50% of deaths amongst people with diabetes mellitus, cancer and dementia now comprise the leading causes of death in people with diabetes mellitus in some countries or regions. Additionally, studies have demonstrated notable links between diabetes mellitus and a broad range of comorbidities, including cognitive decline, functional disability, affective disorders, obstructive sleep apnoea and liver disease, and have refined our understanding of the association between diabetes mellitus and infection. However, no published review currently synthesizes this evidence to provide an in-depth discussion of the burden and risks of these emerging complications. This Review summarizes information from systematic reviews and major cohort studies regarding emerging complications of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus to identify and quantify associations, highlight gaps and discrepancies in the evidence, and consider implications for the future management of diabetes mellitus.

Prevalence of Hepatitis C and treatment uptake in regional Victoria.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in regional Victoria and assess amenability to treatment. METHODS: Households were randomly selected and one adult from each was invited to a 'clinic', which included HCV, liver function and liver stiffness/fibrosis tests. Participants reactive to HCV were asked about their amenability to treatment. RESULTS: The study identified eight cases of HCV (antibody and PCR reactive, 1.1%) among 748 participants, half of which were new diagnoses. Most of the HCV-reactive participants were male (89%). Liver function and fibrosis were not significantly different between HCV-reactive and non-reactive participants. Most participants notified of their HCV were amenable to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HCV in this regional Victorian study (1.1%) was similar to the Australian modelled prevalence estimates. Most participants were amenable to treatment. Implications for public health: The unique opportunity to eliminate HCV requires a reorientation of the public health response toward systematic implementation of treatment to address barriers and reduce stigma and discrimination for marginalised populations. This should include targeting regional areas where the HCV prevalence of undiagnosed cases may be higher than metropolitan areas.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current concepts, epidemiology and management strategies.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most prevalent liver disease in the world. It involves a spectrum of conditions from hepatic steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis, and is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It is defined by presence of steatosis in 5% of hepatocytes or more in the absence of other causes of fatty liver. The metabolic syndrome is the major known risk factor for NAFLD. Dietary contributors such as high fructose intake and coffee consumption appear to increase and decrease the risk of disease respectively, but these links are unclear. Genetic associations have also been identified. The estimated prevalence of the disease varies according to diagnostic method and population demographics. It appears to be a major issue in Europe with population studies showing up to 50% of the individuals are affected while in the USA one in three adults are estimated to have NAFLD. Laboratory investigations and ultrasound are typically first-line investigations. Fibrosis may be assessed noninvasively through transient elastography and biomarkers but liver biopsy remains the gold standard to quantify hepatic damage. Associated comorbidities include cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Weight loss, dietary changes and exercise are recommended in management. Medications should be considered to manage underlying risk factors including insulin resistance. Surgical options include bariatric procedures and liver transplantation. The combination of rising prevalence and significant potential complications warrant further research into NAFLD, particularly in areas with research gaps including Eastern Europe.

Abdominal Anatomy Tutorial Using a Medical Imaging Platform.

Introduction: Easing students' transition to the clinical environment is vital in medical education. For anatomy, this can be achieved by incorporating medical imaging. Most resources for study of imaging solely cover structural identification, which does not adequately prepare students to interpret imaging in clinical practice. This resource adds to a series of tutorials incorporating clinical applications of anatomy. Methods: The tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint that guided students through principles of abdominal anatomy. It integrated radiological images, including X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, plus clinical correlations and self-evaluation. It was evaluated as a review tool, using repeated-measures control/experimental design, on 100 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Testing comprised knowledge-based questionnaires, a Likert self-efficacy scale, and open-ended evaluation questions. Results: Results suggest the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p < .001), as the experimental group's posttutorial test scores were superior for direct questions by 32% on average. This difference was particularly significant for short-answer and multiple-choice questions. Students' confidence with anatomy and imaging was enhanced. Discussion: These results demonstrate the tutorial's strength as a review resource. Unlike our previous work, where students received tutorials alongside anatomy teaching, this tutorial was assessed after coursework completion with similar results. Direct knowledge significantly improved; however, indirect applications did not, perhaps due to complexity of the region. Nonetheless, the results reinforce the value of the series' tutorials as review tools, as well as adjunct tools alongside anatomy curricula. There is scope for further research into their use as stand-alone resources.

Pelvis Anatomy Tutorial Using Radiological Images.

Introduction: Improving integration between basic science and clinical application is essential in medical education. Anatomy courses can do this by focusing on medical imaging interpretation. Most imaging textbooks rely on structural identification, which novice learners often struggle to apply to the health care environment, particularly in complex regions like the pelvis, which is multifaceted and differs substantially between sexes. To address this deficit, this resource extends our imaging-based tutorial series. Methods: This tutorial was a self-administered PowerPoint incorporating X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, which are all often used for the pelvic region, as well as self-quizzing and clinical applications. Using repeated-measures, control/experimental design, the tutorial was evaluated as a review tool for 57 Australian medical students in preclerkship years. Participants were evaluated by a rating self-efficacy scale, knowledge-based testing (multiple-choice, short-answer, and identification questions), and feedback to open-ended questions. Results: Results indicate that the tutorial significantly improved direct knowledge (p = .006), as the experimental group's posttutorial scores for direct questions were superior by 21% on average. Significant improvements occurred specifically for direct short-answer and indirect image-identification questions. Discussion: These results suggest the tutorial is an effective review tool. While previous tutorials were evaluated as adjunct tools, this tutorial was evaluated post-anatomy teaching with similar results. Students improved in direct and applied anatomy following tutorial exposure. This suggests that the tutorial series comprises valuable review and supplementary materials. None of our tutorials have been evaluated as a sole mechanism for teaching anatomy or imaging.

Dysphagia: Thinking outside the box.

Dysphagia is a common symptom that is important to recognise and appropriately manage, given that causes include life threatening oesophageal neoplasia, oropharyngeal dysfunction, the risk of aspiration, as well as chronic disabling gastroesophageal reflux (GORD). The predominant causes of dysphagia varies between cohorts depending on the interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors, and is changing with time. Currently in white Caucasian societies adopting a western lifestyle, obesity is common and thus associated gastroesophageal reflux disease is increasingly diagnosed. Similarly, food allergies are increasing in the west, and eosinophilic oesophagitis is increasingly found as a cause. Other regions where cigarette smoking is still prevalent, or where access to medical care and antisecretory agents such as proton pump inhibitors are less available, benign oesophageal peptic strictures, Barrett's oesophagus, adeno- as well as squamous cell carcinoma are endemic. The evaluation should consider the severity of symptoms, as well as the pre-test probability of a given condition. In young white Caucasian males who are atopic or describe heartburn, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease will predominate and a proton pump inhibitor could be commenced prior to further investigation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy remains a valid first line investigation for patients with suspected oesophageal dysphagia. Barium swallow is particularly useful for oropharyngeal dysphagia, and oesophageal manometry mandatory to diagnose motility disorders.